Socialization within the “Burning Man” community

Socialization within the “Burning Man” community

Sumedh Chatterjee


Burning Man is an annual art event in the Black Rock Desert in Nevada. It attracts a large community of people who stay there temporarily. The mission of burning man is to produce a positive spiritual change in the world. Similar to the Esalen Institute, Burning Man is now an expanded organization, which has founding principles just like it.  This paper explores the socialization of the community associated with this event and the social construction of this event.  This is analyzed in the light of theories from different experts in the field of cognitive sociology/social psychology such as  Stryker, Cooley, Pagis, Holloman, Brekhus, Becker, Goffman, Fine, Heider & Weiner and others.

Research shows that the Burning Man community is adequately self-sustaining and wants to overthrow authority. It has a rule that goes – “say YES to everything”. It is important that the members of the community participate at Burning Man event.  Burning a wooden man (effigy) is a metaphor for overthrowing authority. The event brings to light Stryker’s views that “human beings are an active agent of behavior, not just a passive respondent to external stimuli”. The videos and pictures related to the burning man event show how  “Burning man” has a real bohemian vibe to it. The ways people are dressed seem to breach normality. The community of burning man is diverse and there is definitely an emphasis on freedom. It attracts a lot of youth because of this quality.

The transformative quality of the burning man community has a lot to do with the experiences that the community had to go through. It had to move out from a site of more conformity -a California beach to one with less conformity -the rocky mountainous desert scenario in Nevada. This reminds me of Cooley’s theory of the looking glass self, which states that we see ourselves, through the mirroring of how others see us.  Pagis talks about shifting attention of humans to the sensations in our bodies. This is probably the meditative quality that the people in the Burning Man community have from restorative experiences. Holloman’s article speaks about “psychic openings” which is a ritual manifestation of emotions. This seems to happen a lot within the burning man community and during the event, without the members actually thinking about it. Just being a part of this environment and watching a burning effigy can have a transformational quality.

William Brekhus splits humans into three groups. Are the people in Burning Man community -Lifestylers, Commuters or Integrators? There seem to be broad ranges of social categories that come into play. Most of the people working on art and the installations would be commuters (something they do) , a large portion of the community is likely to be lifestylers (something they are- e.g. Free-spirited, hippies)  and a lesser portion would be integrators (a part of them but not something directly related with their sense of self and what they do). Most people who go to Burning Man, seem to want to do so because they are 1. Visual people -like seeing art and aesthetic beauty, 2. Free-minded and Liberal -don’t have any pre-conceived notions and are liberal minded, 3. Fantasy-Oriented -escape from reality, and move away from the norm). The community people say that it’s cathartic; it’s difficult not to reevaluate life and how one lives until one lives in the Burning Man lifestyle. It forces people to be creative and delve into the art world along with some idealism.

There is a sense of risk associated with the Burning Man, as one comes with a ticket that essentially says that he/she may die. It gives a person the opportunity to be truly self-sustaining and self-reliant and bring everything that he/she needs. However, it is also a place for self-expression and according to some participants ‘Burning Man’ is the ultimate expression of human catharsis. The reason this place seems so oddball is because it has no institutional cache attached to it. The idea of Burning Man is that when everybody is sharing, everybody has enough.

Goffman has a theory on the presentation of self, in which he describes social interaction and life, as if it is a performance. He also talks about saving face. This sociological concept by him , means the positive social value a person claims for himself. In Burning Man event and community, it would probably be a place where people are constantly performing but for themselves.  People are constantly shelving each other’s back, so there is a lot of “saving face”- The individuals are free to do whatever and not be judged, however there is definitely a possibility for arguments. I refuse to believe that this temporary society does not have any disputes. It could be interesting to see how these disputes are handled. In the terms and agreements of burning man, Black Rock City, LLC reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor disputes among the users.

Howard Becker talks about the social basis of a Drug-Induced experience. He states that when a user takes a drug, mainly a hallucinogen, they experience the world subjectively and it can induce or imitate psychosis. Drug related fatalities are actually fairly uncommon, it seems that most burners realize that wandering into the desert with a head full of LSD to have spiritual experience might not be as good of an idea as it sounds, and take necessary precautions. A Hong Kong fashion model was busted on felony drug charges at the Burning Man counterculture festival and crashed her rented motor home into Reno’s landmark arch.

It is interesting to see whether the people who join the community are attracted to the risk associated with Burning Man. There are people who are classed as “adrenalin junkies”. The “high” one get from dangerous or risky activities is similar to the high one would get from cocaine or amphetamine , only more so. The effect of these stimulants is to flood the brain with dopamine; an adrenaline high is similar. Burning Man itself is an adrenalin filled environment that could by itself recreate a drug-like psychedelic atmosphere. Also being surrounded by the desert heat definitely has a somatic response, affecting the brain (consciousness) in some way.

Berger states in his article “The Social Foundations of Human Experience” that that humans must interpret, define and endow their environment with meanings so as to respond to it effectively. For burners (people who go to Burning Man) life has set up an objective reality from birth, society is telling them what they should be from what they see. At Burning Man, this rule is broken, everyone is treated equally and it is a shared experience.  Any negative stereotypes placed upon the individual by society are removed at this annual art event. The focus is on unity not on individuality. However, the ironic aspect of this is, it’s also all about self-expression, which seems to be a very outward, projection of oneself or their independent thought. Burners want to stand out creatively but also fit in. In a certain sense, burners are walking contradictions.

Fine’s article discusses, social groups and culture creation. I believe that the hippy subculture has a collective identity and the scene that may bring them together is in fact, the event of “Burning Man”. The ritual of art and creation creates an emotional collectivity and a shared mood (Heider and Warner).

Originally imagined as an experiment in creating a utopia where the restrictions of modern life – the nine-to-five rat race, laws and confining societal norms – vanish, the event’s popularity and scope has now exceeded even the creators’ wildest dreams.

On a personal level I would love to immerse myself in the freedom and awe associated with the Burning Man experience and cope with the hardships of life. This in itself is like a spiritual experience where freedom and self-reliance are quite significant.

Consent from a coach’s perspective

Consent from a coach’s perspective

Sumedh Chatterjee


Consent. You’ve heard it before. What is it? Why does it matter?

Consent is permission for something to happen or about to happen. We either practice this, are afraid to ask for it or don’t want to bring it up at all. Now in a fairly liberal environment we understand consent if we have a basic moral compass. However, as far as teaching consent goes, the methodology is sometimes unappealing… especially because we’ve been socially conditioned into thinking about it in the wrong ways. Trigger warning here. Media imagery perpetuates rape by excusing it, validating myths about rape, and/or sexualizing rape. This issue is much more complicated on college campuses now than ever before. It’s about not drinking in excess and putting oneself in a situation where one cannot make conscious decisions. It’s about being honest with your intentions and speaking about it. The key is to be especially aware of how other people around you are feeling. That’s empathy. And this is a skill that’s not easy to learn. But that is why consent is such an important a topic in college campuses; it teaches us to have a dialogue between students and faculty.

So what exactly is the problem with asking for consent?

First, requesting for consent can include non-verbal cues such as body language. Yet it is also true that relying solely on non-verbal communication can lead to misunderstanding. Second, the stereotype is that discussing consent is widely seen as awkward and likely to kill the mood. But if we keep saying consent is “hot,” “cool,” and “creative.” this dilemma can be partly resolved. Consent doesn’t have to “kill the mood”, we just need to find ways to express ourselves without limiting our sex appeal and courtesy. Third, those who have issues with consent don’t have alcohol abuse as the only problem but have problems with psychological well being and mental stability as well. Fourth, we are growing up in a culture that capitalizes on insecurities around dating and sex. Men are afraid of not escalating sexually with women while, women are insecure about not being desired and this becomes a vicious cycle. Fifth, men and women, in fact both often drink in excess in social situations only to become unable to control their libido and/or actions.

We can’t live in assumption regarding consent. Nor can we give-in to brainwashed norms. We need to break the stereotypes and have a discussion about this issue. Ultimately, women aren’t flesh-form antidepressants that exist to make men feel better about their own insecurities. And men aren’t sex-craved maniacs supposed to constantly show their courtesy to prove their chivalrous nature to validate themselves. Choice of clothing and attitude shouldn’t be perceived as “asking for it” or implying seduction. People often use choice of clothing and attitude and automatically assume it has to do with promiscuity. Attending the party and dressing scantily clad creates a misleading assumption to people. Dressing this way should not be considered provocative. Men are excused to show their skin, so why are women “asking for it” when they show more skin? There’s an evident double standard, that when a man who has more sexual partners he’s labeled an alpha male, but a woman is easy or even worse, (slutty). 

One of my friends was on the dance floor having a good time, however in the midst of dancing, a guy came up to my friend and stood there in front of her. He didn’t ask her to dance, he didn’t dance to assume they would be dancing; he physically used his larger, masculine body to invade this girls personal space. It was obvious he was already assuming sex. It was so obvious he was blinded by a misguided culture. She clearly said no multiple times. Now sure, one can say that no can mean “maybe later” or no can mean “some other time”, however this particular male had a reputation on campus. I knew this guy; he acted like my friend, always trying to build rapport with me. But he had problems. Problems beyond having a drinking problem. Now seeing this, I came up to him, reassuring him that “she said no, man” as polite as possible, not trying to start a fight for no reason or be labelled a white knight and never trying to challenge him in any way. He took this in the wrong way, belligerently drunk saying the most ironic statement ever “What’s WRONG with you man, what’s your PROBLEM?”. He walked off, my friend was okay, however, I didn’t feel so because I wasn’t the problem and I got verbally jousted for it. Nevertheless, I wasn’t trying to be a hero, but ended up being one. Here I motivate people to interfere in such situations. It shouldn’t be something that’s intimidating. It is easier to stay out of it. But as humans we should look out for each other as a community. When we see a dangerous situation, we shouldn’t hesitate to step in. Don’t just be a bystander.

Now, let’s discuss some other strategies as well.

What can we do about this? We need to make sure psychology services are adequately supportive not only for the victims but also for the perpetrators in campuses. We need students not to feel intimidated by asking for help. We need to have an open conversation with all of the stakeholders. It’s not that talk during a sexual encounter is inherently a turn-off — far from it. But there’s a big difference between sexy banter or endearments and mandatory checks to confirm you aren’t assaulting your partner. We need to make sure we are all on the same page.  We may require new laws for self protection of vulnerable students and abide by them.

There’s a solution to this kind of thinking and situations such as in the story above. Self-actualization- the desire for reaching one’s potential and creating self-awareness can be the way forward. Creating your identity. Finding out who you are. That is what college is about, right? The journey; creating a strong sense of self so we can handle uncomfortable situations such as the one above.

Ask yourself, who am I in this scenario? We are sometimes different people in all of the interactions we have with others. Why so? I ask you all to read about this, research, talk, socialize, and involve yourself as much as possible. Do something. I can’t coach all by myself. I need your help. As a perpetrator or aggressor or whatever you want to call it- just think- what you do, will not be undone. You will have to accept the consequences and will be labeled for your actions.

We need to change our mindsets; sex is about communication and exploration. Sex communication shouldn’t be a taboo and sex shouldn’t be a pressure. Not just intercourse but with touching and other types of physical escalation… even with clothes on. Consent must also be considered when invading personal boundaries. Without this exchange of awareness of the self and others, we feel awkward and perplexed in social situations. How can we handle ourselves? How can we ask for help? We need to reach out and help our peers, and we’re doing a pretty good job of it already. It’s working. We’re setting ourselves up so as not to worry about this but this problem still persists. But we have to start looking out and looking within to make it happen.

Now imagine a world, where everyone is effectively communicating. A world where people aren’t getting blackout drunk for escaping reality. A world where a woman’s voice is as strong as a man’s. A world where we are treating each other with respect and reciprocated pleasure. A world where consent is mutual. True, there will always be roadblocks. However, we can overcome these. There is a lot of talk about issues like this already but we need to further establish some rules. Not to say that consent should be policed but should be a part of education. It should be the default of human nature to give and get consent. We need to be proactive in thinking about consensual approaches. We need to think about the future of this planet and its safety. The psychological services in campuses worldwide need to be supportive to the cause. There is always room for improvement. Let’s take that chance and step forward, let’s celebrate consent and practice it too. Blessings.

The Artist as entrepreneur – A response

The Artist as entrepreneur – A response

Sumedh Chatterjee

Actors crave empowerment as much as the next person, but entrepreneurship
doesn’t necessarily correlate to success. Business-minded individuals have impulses
that can gain insight from an actor’s perspective and vice versa.

Artists give value to the work they do not however give that much importance to
marketing or promotion, which in my opinion is equally important for success.
Teaching artists self-empowerment is an important process, young artists should
learn the process of taking charge of their own careers. Some universities have
started something called an ‘Arts Enterprise’, which is a good idea. However, I feel
entrepreneurship is given more importance in bigger schools like Yale as opposed to
smaller ones. Entrepreneurship can be taught, however I feel art cannot. It is
something that you discover and experience for yourself. I don’t like how some
groups are merging creativity and entrepreneurship together as they are two very
different things (e.g. Oberlin college).

Teaching enterpreurship leads to maximizing creative opportunities more, however
maximizing profit is also important if you wish to pursue an artistic career path. I
also feel some universities have vague terms for their programs like “Center for New
Performance”. In theory, when you are having fun, “geeking out” (as Michael J Miller
calls it), creating your own work for yourself should be able to survive even if they
aren’t particularly business-minded.

I may argue to say that some actors aren’t “naturally entrepreneurial” as some may
just be drawn to theater as a hobby and not prospective merchandise. Nowadays, it
is said that “theater people” should have an industry-based background in business
training. I feel learning business definitely improves your chances of job success
however I feel it is not an essential component to being a good actor. I do support
creating cultural arenas and bringing third-world actors into the US to improve their
skills and receiving hands on experiences, since there are amazing actors (who may
also be Business students) abroad. I think in the end, making goals and falling
through with them is most important. If you get paid for what you love doing, it is the
best feeling in the world.

Transcendence, Peak Experiences and Passion.

Transcendence, Peak Experiences and Passion.

Sumedh Chatterjee


Transcendence is the idea of moving beyond – the mind, the self, beyond conventional paradigms. PSYCHOLOGY- translated from greek- psyche (spirit)– in the West, they translate it to the “mind”, ology just means the study of. Middle English: from Old French transcendre or Latin transcendere, from trans- ‘across’ + scandere ‘climb’. It’s an innate human need. Maslow started to research on this topic after the top of his hierarchy of needs, self-actualization. He claimed beyond the triangle was transcendence. A search for the sacred (holy, meaningful) which allows self-transcendence. The more we push our personal boundaries, we grow. However we have to do this in a healthy compassionate manner. There was a study in the United states showing that 69% percent of people had a pressing need for spiritual growth in their lives. Mental health and psychological well being (PWB) is strongly related with spirituality and religion (Hill and Pargament, 2003).

RELIGION improves wellbeing, how? By enhancing identity, creates a network of social support, and a clear theoretical framework to deal with existential questions ( Elliot and Hayward, 2007). The rise of secularism in the mid 1900s promoted a separation between spirituality and religion and acquired distinct connotations. Religion involves group validated organized means and methods for the search. A practicing relating to God.

RELIGION is the search for the sacred and the group validated means involved in the search. SPIRITUALITY is only the first element. Religion without spiritual element feels empty. ST (self-transcendence) is shifting our own perspectives, viewpoints, truths, and construal self, as well as extension of care, compassion and concern toward others. ST helped breast cancer, homeless people and allowed greater awareness of self-bias and motivations. Greater life satisfaction includes decreases in attachment. Self-boundaries helps greater self-acceptance (inward), reaching out to others and a connection with nature (outwards). With self-acceptance, everything changes, we become more. As a child, the potential accumulating rights, wrongs have a narrower version. As we grow up, we also grow we empathy (after about 11 years old). Our original self is boundless. Transcendence can be triggered by an outward connection, for example staring into the eyes of a child or baby or staring into the horizon, or feeling connected to nature.

A Peak Experience ( Zenith Experience), is a positive experience of spiritual awakening (Sharp, 2010). A peak experiences is essentially a gentle, spontaneous crown opening and as such may be viewed as a positive, but weak version of a Mystical Experience. According to Maslow, everyone is capable of having a peak experience (Maslow, 1962) and in fact most people, when asked, report having peak experiences either in adulthood or childhood. Keutzer (2007) reports that 80% of a sample of college students reported peak experiences and that these reports were independent of religious activity, age, or course level.

A Peak Experience is characterized by a sudden feeling of intense happiness, well-being, wonder, awe, loss of fear and defensiveness, and transcendent joy (Maslow, 1971). A peak experience sometimes includes a brief mystical experience such as the realization of ultimate truths like the unity of all things, the essential oneness of creation, the holiness of consciousness, or some such high level spiritual generalization. Davis, Lockwood and Wright (1991: 88) define a peak experience as follows. A peak experience is an experience that provides:

“…an almost overwhelming sense of pleasure, euphoria, or joy, a deep sense of peacefulness or tranquility, feeling in tune, in harmony, or at one with the universe, a sense of wonder or awe, altered perceptions of time and/or space, such as expansion, a feeling of deeper knowing or profound understanding, a deep feeling of love (for yourself, another, or all people), a greater awareness of beauty or appreciation, a sense that it would be difficult or impossible to describe adequately in words.”

There’s a type of happiness called Chaironic happiness. This links to transcendence. (Wong) states it as a scream of blessing,  independent of anything in your life. An example of this kind of happiness is like during an awakening or a sudden enlightenment or the serenity a monk feels during deep meditation.

PASSION is a strong inclination toward an activity that people like, find important and invest time and energy. There’s a scale that measures passion called the Passionate Love Scale in positive psychology. There is a dualistic approach to this- harmonious passion and obsessive passion, the latter being more disadvantageous to ones growth.  Under which circumstances were your passion internalized? Since passion is a “strong and barely controllable emotion.” it is a surprise to me that in harmonious passion, there’s a sense of control or autonomy over one’s passion. So go and search for something higher, live a passionate life, make your own rules, lean into your fearless spirituality and know how to transcend the self to breakdown your ego. Your narrow vision will slowly expand and it’ll push the boundaries to what you thought to be possible. Try and push for peak experiences and believe in yourself. See yourself as who you want to be.


Connecting with Creativity